It is certainly easy to pick out 5 or 6 major innovations that have occured in the last 4000 years of sailing. But most were evolutions rather than revolutions. For example the keel evolved by first adding ballast in the bottom of tall ships, then the J boats started deepening that keel to get the weight lower. The 12 meters started to sprout proper keels (short wing-like keels rahter than full length keels). So really it is hard to pick a point in that evolution and say “here is the first keel”. So it is hard to argue that it was a leap forward. More like a long slow crawl.
The same is true of rig design. The Marconi Rig was the result of a long slow process of improving the gaff rig. While the Marconi Rig did improve pointing ability, VMG was not really that much improved until battens were added. So again it was a rather slow process of evolution.
Wood - the original building material - is in fact a fiber/resin composite. The fact that it arrives at the boat building shed in a “pre-cured” form cannot take away from the fact that in most other sensed, it behaves very much like other more modern composite materials.
Even RC boats are an evolution from putting a dowel and a sail on a piece of flotsom that every 8 year old has done the first time they visit the seashore.
I would argue that some of the things that are going on today are much bigger leaps forward in a much shorter period of time than anything that has happened prior. Two major leaps are taking place that cannot be attributed to design evolution (please don’t shoot me for this): CBTF and Foils.
CBTF completely changes the role of the keel. By seperating the job of creating lateral resistance from the job of generating righting moment, you can do each job much mre efficiently. In the last 5 to 10 years, this innovation has progressed from the prototype stage to the premier maxi classes. The speed improvements associated with CBTF go way beyond incremental. The Schock 40 CBTF boat carries the same PHRF speed rating at the Santa Cruz 70 (A boat nearly twice the length and one of the fastest boats of the 1980s). I can’t think of any other innovation that has resulted in such a radical increase in speed potential for ocean racers.
Hydrofoils are the other innovation. Their impact has been a lot more localized so far than CBTF, but I think we are just seeing the tip of the iceberg on this design. So far foils are limited to a few dinghy classes, but foils completely change the way the boat is sailed. The speed improvement is huge. The reason this qualifies as a true innovation rather than an evolution is that you did not see any intermediate “missing link” designs. The closest thing to a missing link is the curved “banana boards” that are half daggerboard, and half hydrofoil, but these have been developed AFTER the pure hydrofoil rather than before.
Now before you complain that these designs have not helped (nor may ever help) the average sailor or even more than a few racers, let me just say that I agree. We may never see the day where every keelboat uses CBTF (or some derivative thereof) but you will see this technology contiue to grow. It will filter down to cruising boats and you will see a large portion of Grand Prix boat designs adopt this technology over the next 20 or 30 years. Hydrofoils will probably never gain that much acceptance. But you will probably see 5 to 10 classes that sail exclusively with Foils. Some may even be one design classes. I could see a Foiler 14 one design class spin off from the I14 class the same way the current OD14 class did a decade ago.
But don’t take my word for it on these innovations: Pick up the latest issue of Sailing World (pages 12 and 13) to see how they talk about Foilers. And you need only go back a few issues to find a cover story on Canting Ballast (“Full Tilt Maxis”). Going back further you will find equally enthusiastic treatment of Wild Oats and the Schock 40 as well.
Will Gorgen