Sorry for not reply sooner but doing the posts takes a long time. i will try to answer all generally.
These post follows the line of my blog - Design accessible to all.
I am not doing a RG 65 plan, it is a consequence of the desire to discuss in the blog, with people from around the world, all aspects related to the design of a RG 65. What is the data that we have, what is the consequences in doing this or that, rather than generic, but mathematically and running in the drawing .
it’s an opportunity to learn, exchange ideas with people around the world, be they curious or technical.
These posts could become an experience of brotherhood of all people, between people who like to talk, learn and teach, about something in common, in this case RG 65.
As I say in my first post,
" Will be a series of posts about RG 65 design.
All peoples will be welcome.
Data, questions, doubts, divergences, are welcome."
Logically I need explain the Freeship use because I do not want that the lack of use freeship is an obstacle.
i thank everyone here at this thread, with some already exchanged emails and i deeply honor it, because i was always very well attended.
i’m waiting for you with your questions, doubts, disagreements, agreements, teachings, etc.
Let’s talk about the design of a rg 65?
Dick, surely you’re right, let’s put all the plans there. This i am doing so open, i do not think will be very good, because it’s my first RG 65 project, but if it is reasonable i’ll put there.
And it would be funny if it were several designers from the same project, just join, all we will do a joint project.
Thanks to Eric, Craig, Dick and Martin