Okay, you seem like an ambitious guy. Here is something to chew on. Probably choke on is more like it. Too much data.
Upper mast bend automatically relieving the pressure on the mainsail in high wind/puffs is a nifty problem. It seems like there should be a solution and it also seems like the optimum solution will take tremendous effort.
There is not a lot of available universal across-model-boat-classes data. I suppose there is not a lot of available data period with respect to any classes of model boats.
It seems to me that the optimum is that the boat be fully powered up until the wind is high enough to make the boat heal beyond say 30 degrees. At that point the sails should automatically start to depower. One of the automatic adjustments would be mast bend especially upper mast bend. There is a lot of info available on the internet by doing a google search under such things as ?upper mast bend?. You can look at the WB Sails website where there is good info. Bethwaite in his High Performance book talks about an ancient Finn mast where the top of the mast flopped to the side at a certain point/wind strength. This is possible for a cat/no jib rig. There are lot of books that mention mast bend and depowering the sails of course. One interesting item that I found was from Paul Elvstrom in his Keelboat and Dinghy book. He said that he was sailing a Dragon in a 30 knot wind with the mast bending so much that he was afraid the jumpers would break. A very hard puff hit and the jumpers folded righ tback and th eboat became tremendously fast. When the jumpers folded the top of the mast went to leeward and the mid-mast wnet a little forward and also to windward due to the tension of middle lower stay. So in, he said, in the hardest puff the mast adjusted its sideways bend automatically. On page 173 of the hardcover book.
That is one well known automatic depowering tool that you are not using ? having the uppers be looser than the lowers thereby allowing the mid-mast to bend to windward relative to the upper mast in puffs. Lester Gilbert talks about that on his website ? see short spreaders. You do not need a mast made of two different materials to do this.
I think the original TS2 sailors conducted extensive 2 boat testing to optimize the rig and cause the rig to depower dynamically in puffs. Some of the things they came up with were location of the stay attachment on the mast and (short) spreader length, I believe.
The problem becomes how to apply what you read to your particular boat. And you can probably envision that it will be difficult to determine what works and what doesn?t without extensive 2 boat testing.
It is apparent that your idea of two different materials does has not caught anyone?s interest on this board.
Some interesting sites
Depowering the Star by Mark Reynolds
http://www.quantumsails.com/products/onedesign/cni.asp?NID=229&CID=5
Dynamic Response ? Frank Bethwaite ? Reach for the sky
http://www.boats.com/content/default_detail.jsp?contentid=7516
Composite tip ? Frank Bethwaite ? Rig elasticity ? Woollahra Tasar
http://www.members.shaw.ca/raspencer/racing/franknotes1.html
Ups?And downs of side bend ? WB Sails
http://www.wb-sails.fi/news/98_2_SideBend/SideBend.htm
Some thoughts on sailing light ? Steve Ulian
http://www.usaj22.com/sailing_light.html
Interesting pdf site
http://www.proctormasts.co.uk/fittings/Proctor_catalogue.pdf
http://www.c-tech.co.nz/article_ausailingmay01.htm
http://www.snipe.org/articles/sw5-93.html
There is a wealth of info available. Big problem trying to determine what is applicable and how to apply it.
Scott